Acceleration
"V6s have fine power at all speeds, mesh nicely with 5-speed automatic. We've had no opportunity to test the 2.3 4-cyl, but it's likely to feel underpowered when heavily loaded or going uphill."

Value
"These Mazdas share an aged but still-viable design with their Ford Ranger siblings. Rangers, however, are available with more popular equipment and at a greater number of dealerships."

Ride
"Decent for trucks, regardless of engine or brand name. They jiggle some on rough roads, but absorb big bumps well."

Economy
Test Ford Ranger 4WD SuperCabs with 4.0 V6 and automatic transmission averaged 12.9-14.4 mpg in mix of city/highway driving; comparable Mazda B-Series models will be similar. EPA fuel-economy estimates for 2WD versions are 2-3 mpg better. Expect little difference with 3.0 V6. 4-cyl models should average in the low-to-mid 20s. Ford and Mazda recommend regular-grade fuel for all engines.

Noise
"Not quite as car-quiet as Dodge Dakota, but has better isolation from engine, wind, and road noise than most compact trucks. V6s are smooth."

Comfort - Front
"Good head and leg room, but three adults are a tight squeeze, and entry/exit borders on awkward in high-riding 4WD versions and 2WD Dual Sport models."

Comfort - Rear
"Cab Plus 4's rear half doors are beneficial, but extended-cab's rear-seat area best used for toddlers or cargo. Regular-cab has slightly more seat travel, seatback recline than rivals."

Controls
"Convenient dashboard, solid overall assembly, and good-quality interior materials."

Cargo Room
"Better-than-average behind-seat regular-cab space. Extended cabs carry lots of stuff. Dual rear doors are nice, but don't open independently of the fronts, making loading difficult in confined spaces."